The Change in policing
During the past 30 years, something has happened to the American criminal justice system that never should have happened. It became an industry. Thirty or more years ago, most crimes had victims. These days, the majority of crimes prosecuted revolve around drugs and alcohol. In that same 30 years, America’s incarceration rate grew to exceed that of any culture in history. In a culture where so many are without work, putting each other in chains has become big business
“The drug lawyer is always the attorney I use. He is honest, knowledgeable, and professional. I’d recommend him to anyone looking for an attorney who always has your best interest at heart.”
Why Choose The Drug Lawyer Notes
- A big benefit you get by hiring me is that I am quite an expert at issue spotting. That is why I graduated in the top 5% of my law school class. Now, after over twenty years of practicing criminal law almost exclusively, if the written discovery reveals there is something wrong with their case, I will see it! I will then explain it to you and estimate the odds of improving your situation by various courses of action whether that means filing motions or exploring diversion programs.
Oklahoma’s Drug Lawyer
(Criminal Defense Lawyer)
Highway Drug Interdiction Cases
If you are talking to lawyers about beating your highway drug interdiction case, ask those lawyers how these difficulties can be overcome. Ask those lawyers why 98% of Oklahoma drug cases result in plea bargains and what makes your case different. If your case is among the 98%, the time to start creating the conditions for your best plea bargain is yesterday.
The biggest benefit you get by hiring me is that you get the straight scoop straight from the start. Most lawyers don’t tell you that, statistically, there is a 94% chance you will, sooner or later, enter a plea on your case. Lafler v. Cooper (2012). Typically, a plea offer is extended the first time a prosecutor and the defense lawyer meet on a case. Some lawyers don’t tell Defendants the offer immediately either because it is too good or too bad and they fear they will not get the balance of their fee.
HIGHWAY DRUG INTERDICTION
– A PEA AND SHELL GAME WITH NO PEA
When Oklahoma became the most liberal medical marijuana state in the country, it did not stop interdicting drugs on the highway. For well over twenty years, highway drug interdiction has been a cottage industry of Oklahoma law enforcement. Numerous state agencies and even counties and municipalities depend upon highway drug interdiction as a source of revenue. With the complicity of the courts, law enforcement has created a science of avoiding the strictures of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures. If you have been arrested by a trained highway drug interdiction officer, your arrest probably went something like this:
You were stopped for following too closely, improper lane change, failure to signal, or speeding. These are the “usual suspects” because they are notoriously difficult for defense lawyers to disprove. If the officer is experienced, he will ostensibly stop you for two or more reasons. That way, even if a defense lawyer can invalidate one reason for the stop, he can rarely invalidate two or more reasons. Just so you know, you were really stopped for having an out-of-state tag and/or because you were in a rental. That is not illegal, so long as the officer doesn’t admit that that is why he stopped you. Whren v. the United States, 1996.
The officer returned to his car, handed you a warning and your license. He did that because he knew that, until you had your license, you were not legally “free to leave.” That way, the questions that came next did not violate Miranda or the Fourth Amendment. Then as you were about to exit his vehicle, he asks if he can ask you a few more questions. He then asked if you had drugs and/or large amounts of money and if he could search your vehicle.
You might still believe that you should have answered differently. It would have made no difference. If you consented to the search, it was valid consent because the officer will testify that you were free to leave and the consent was therefore valid. If you did not consent, the officer will testify that his observations during the stop added up to probable cause to search and that you never really were free to leave. A pea and shell game with no pea.
It is also possible that while you were stopped another officer arrived with a drug dog. A drug dog scan is not a search and does not require probable cause but a drug dog alert does provide probable cause to search. Illinois v. Cabelles, 2005.
Officers typically put the driver and passenger(s) together in a police vehicle while they conduct their search. They often leave people with their phones during this time. In most units, the officer has forward and rear-facing cameras that captured the audio and video of events inside the officer’s vehicle while he is conducting the search. Thus, ANYTHING that you said in the officer’s vehicle is probably on audio/video.
initial Free Consultation available
If you want to know if your case can be won, or, if it cannot be won how to achieve the most desirable outcome call The Drug Lawyer at 855-85-DRUGS.